In his science-fictional “Foundation Trilogy”, Isaac Asimov famously hypothesized a future science called “psychohistory”, a mathematically grounded theory of generalized and predictive human action, based on an amalgamation of psychology, history, and sociology. The future galactic empire was managed by this theory and practice (look out – almost seventy year old spoilers!) except for an exceptional character that was not anticipated and essentially unpredicable.
Asimov had in mind well validated continuous and statistical theories of physics, for example for idealized gases and their laws. I was stuck by an image for an explanation of turbulence that highlighted key elements of velocity, density, pressure, and viscosity, and how it was (in my mind) analogical to antagonistic individuals, dominating leaders, submissive society, and affiliated coteries. Of course, an article below states that turbulence is still too complicated to provably model correctly at this point in time.
I had no idea that psychohistory was claimed to be an actual field of study these days, albeit being somewhat controversial in its authenticity. And it doesn’t seem to have any mathematical basis yet, as far as I know. Mathematician Dan Crisan gave an inaugural talk a few years ago that was hypothesizing using heat equations instead of fluid dynamics as a basis. Even so, we can’t seem to properly model any sort of social action so how could psychohistory be within our grasp?
In these turbulent times perhaps we should make an effort to understand ourselves a bit better, as we hope to navigate between the Charybdisian whirlpool of civil discord and environmental collapse and the Scyllaian rocks of fascism, authoritarianism, and / or totalitarianism. But hey, isn’t Apple doing an Apple TV+ series based on Asimov’s books? Let’s all tune in!
Further Reading:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychohistory_(fictional)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychohistory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundation_(TV_series)
https://www.quantamagazine.org/why-turbulence-is-a-hard-physics-problem-20190128/
https://www.quantamagazine.org/videos/what-is-turbulence/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navier–Stokes_equations
Philip Ball / Critical Mass : How One Thing Leads to Another (2004)
Concerning Professor Dan Crisan:
Click to access talkinaugural230113.pdf
And also this quite long but interesting essay:
[*11.166]
<>